Is Mein Kampf Still Too Dangerous?

Is Mein Kampf Still Too Dangerous?

Since Hitler was formally domiciled in Munich, his mansion, including the copyright to Mein Kampf, dropped to the German federal state of Bavaria.

Until now, the Bavarian state has promised that the text is harmful, and any effort to republish this inflammatory publication a comprehensive, if tortuous, accounts of Hitler’s anti-Semitic ideology along with his plans for world domination was obstructed.

This choice is absurd. The text is publicly available online in several languages, such as English (the first English editions appeared in the 1930s). And many million (largely unread) copies of Mein Kampf offered in Nazi Germany were frequently handed down to relatives following the war, and so are still about.

New Variant

In 2015, the Bavarian country’s control over the copyright will expire, and everybody is going to be permitted to reprint and publish Mein Kampf.

In fact, the Bavarian police have commissioned an academic version of their text, annotated by top historians to place Hitler’s inflammatory statements in their appropriate context. This variant was broadly welcomed.

The Bavarian country’s suppression of Mein Kampf has at all times been controversial one of historians, who have pointed to the inconsistency of this choice, as Hitler’s other writings are available in Germany since the 1950s.

Underneath the official suppression of German editions of Mein Kampf establishes the unfounded suspicion that the text could fortify neo-Nazism and stays too dangerous for public consumption.

The Bavarian country’s mindset is based on the exact simplistic premise that Mein Kampf functioned as the blueprint for exactly what Hitler and the Nazis did during the Third Reich.

This perspective fundamentally exaggerates the importance of the publication and has been disregarded over decades of research that highlight the exceptionally complex decision-making procedures of the Nazi regime.

Nevertheless, Mein Kampf is significant since it indicates that Hitler needed a more or less coherent world view, the principles of that were a barbarous anti-Semitism along with the strategy for beating “living space” (Lebensraum) for the Germans in Eastern Europe.

Too Dangerous?

English-speaking papers and journals, always eager for sensationalist Nazi-related headlines, have lately reinforced the promise that Mein Kampf is too hazardous for Germans that continue to be prone to Nazi ideology. Nothing could be farther from the mark.

For several decades now, a very critical opinion of the Nazi past has emerged as a company part of German national identity, exemplified most clearly possibly by the Berlin memorial for those countless European Jews murdered during the Holocaust.

However, there’s a dangerous possibility for anti-Semitism, neo-Nazism and far-right extremism in Germany, since the newly discovered series of murders committed with a neo-Nazi terror mobile shows.

However, neo-Nazism and far-right extremism are likely more prevalent in Germany than in other European nations. Due to Germany’s Nazi past, however, the world media are very understandably more likely to diagnose these alarming happenings in Germany than elsewhere.

The current electoral gains of the far right in the French presidential elections and the 2011 mass murder perpetrated by the Deadly right-wing extremist, Anders Breivik, imply an extremely dangerous increase of far-right extremism throughout Europe from the context of their worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Text Demystification

The long overdue publication of a scholarly, annotated version of Mein Kampf in Germany allows Germans to get this contentious, but important text which provides an insight to the worldview of a few of the 20th century’s most brutal characters.

Whether or not people will read a fresh variant of Mein Kampf is another matter. If more individuals had read Mein Kampf from the 1930s, maybe they’d have obtained Hitler’s ideology seriously.